Twitter You Tube Facebook Autobodynews Linked In

Wednesday, 15 July 2020 21:18

Federal Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Allstate Case

Written by Emmariah Holcomb, glassBYTEs.com

U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza denied Auto Glass America (AGA) and its owner Charles Isaly’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in its assignment of benefits (AOB) fraud lawsuit July 13.

The ongoing legal battle is between Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (collectively Allstate) and defendants AGA and Isaly.


According to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, a party may “move to dismiss the claims against it for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.”


Attacks on subject matter jurisdiction come in two forms: facial and factual attacks.


AGA and Isaly also say they reached two settlements with Allstate, and submitted two mediation agreements that supported disposing of several hundred state court small claims actions.


Defendants argued Allstate improperly included the settled cases to “satisfy the amount the insurance company listed in its complaint.” The defendants also argued settled claims should be deducted from the amount Allstate listed.


“The mediation agreements also include other named plaintiffs involved in the settlements and do not specify how much was paid by plaintiffs. Fortunately, plaintiffs have submitted their supplemental rule disclosures, which contain detailed calculations of their alleged damages and establish that the amount in controversy far exceeds the minimum requirement. The plaintiffs have met their burden to withstand the defendants’ factual attack,” a portion of the order reads.


Look to a future edition of glassBYTEs for continued coverage of this suit.


We thank glassBYTEs.com for reprint permission. 


(C) 2020 by glassbytes.com. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. For more information contact www.glassbytes.com.

Read 218 times