fbpx
Monday, 01 March 2021 17:29

ABPA Opposes Nebraska Legislative Bill 602

Index

Share This:

 

On Feb. 12, the Automotive Body Parts Association (ABPA) submitted opposition to Nebraska Legislative Bill 602, a bill that will adversely affect Nebraska drivers as it would establish a restriction against the use of alternative parts including aftermarket, recycled, remanufactured and refurbished parts when OEM repair procedures are mandated.

A copy of the submission, addressed to State Sen. Matt Williams, chair of the Banking, Commerce and Insurance Committee, follows:

 

Dear Sen. Williams:

 

The Automotive Body Parts Association (ABPA) respectfully opposes LB 602. As currently written, LB 602 will adversely affect Nebraska drivers as it would establish a restriction against the use of alternative parts including aftermarket, recycled, remanufactured and refurbished parts when OEM repair procedures are mandated.

 

With more than 160 member companies, the ABPA occupies more than 400 distinctive locations, including collision parts distribution centers, manufacturing facilities and parts recycling plants. ABPA’s members are responsible for distributing more than 80% of the independently produced aftermarket crash replacement parts sold to the collision repair trade.

 

The ABPA represents our members who have a presence in Nebraska including LKQ Corp, Meyer Distributing, Arnold Motor Supply and New World International.

 

The ABPA is against any repair procedure that encourages monopolistic behavior that would solely benefit the OEM manufacturer, as this would further burden the consumer. LB 602 would not achieve its goal, as consumers would be adversely affected should they be limited to having their vehicles repaired only with car company branded parts as stated in OEM repair procedures.

 

In addition to the stifling effects of these self-serving repair procedures, there is a mandate in LB 602 which limits consumers to have their vehicle repaired with only car company parts during insurance paid repairs when their vehicle is less than 36 months old.

 

Consumers will be paying more out of their wallets. In 2019, motorists experienced a 4.9% increase in the cost of vehicle collision repair vs. 2018, which far exceeds the rate of inflation. Without the presence of aftermarket parts...


...the car companies have no incentive to keep their pricing in check without competition.

 

Studies have shown that by just having an aftermarket part available in the marketplace, the car companies will lower their list pricing by as much as 8%, if not more.

 

Furthermore, aftermarket parts are typically priced anywhere between 25% to 60% less than the car company branded parts.

 

The car companies and other proponents of these self-serving repair procedures will often cite safety concerns with aftermarket parts.

 

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the federal agency that oversees transportation matters, has concluded aftermarket parts are cosmetic in nature and do not affect vehicle safety. The Insurance Institute of Highway Safety (IIHS) has come to similar conclusions on the safety of aftermarket parts after years of crash testing. They have also stated the only major difference between aftermarket parts and car company parts is the high price variance.

 

Meanwhile, the car companies have been under scrutiny over the past few years with the increased amount of safety recalls they have had to administer due to the faultiness of their own parts. Thank you for your time and consideration.

 

Edward Shalamy, executive director, ABPA.

 

Source: ABPA

 

Share This:

Read 615 times