Auto Rental News has tabulated the results of its third survey deployed to assess the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic.
The survey was sent to independent and franchised (non-corporate) U.S. car rental operators and garnered 87 responses. It was conducted beginning Oct. 9 and tabulated Nov. 10.
The results of this survey, taken with the previous two---tabulated April 14 and May 19---tell the story of an industry that was initially devasted by the pandemic but is in an encouraging---if slow and uneven---process of recovery.
The respondents in this survey were 38% franchise and 51% independent, along with 8% dealership and 3% identifying as other. A plurality (30%) had fleet sizes of 100 to 499 units, with 23% from 50 to 99 units and 17% reporting greater than 500 units.
In terms of customer base, respondents were divided between 40% off-airport/neighborhood and 33% serving airport customers, with the remainder serving leisure destinations, dealerships and exotic rental customers. The average full-time employee count was 19 and part-time was seven.
As of April 14, the pandemic’s effect was clear. By the time the first survey was tabulated April 14, 83% of respondents said they had reduced staff hours. Of that group, 57% reported reducing hours by 51% to 100%, with 14% of respondents reducing staff 100%, indicating they closed their businesses, at least temporarily.
Note that in that first survey, 15% of respondents said that their government had forced them to shut down their business as a part of COVID-19 safety measures. By the second survey, 8% of respondents indicated a 100% reduction in hours.
The final survey, tabulated Nov. 10, reveals a stabilization in staffing. In that survey, a majority of respondents reported that...
...their staffing levels had at least stayed the same from the second into the third quarters, with more respondents increasing their staffing (23%) compared to decreasing.
Mirroring the response on employee count, a majority of respondents said they kept their staff hours the same from the second to the third quarters, while an even percentage of respondents either increased hours (20%) or decreased hours (20%.) The key takeaway---operators are meeting the increase in third-quarter business with static staffing levels and hours.
As business almost ground to a halt by mid-April, the great majority of respondents couldn’t shed fleet because the wholesale market’s infrastructure ground to a halt too. By the second quarter, operators were still faced with business losses, but the lack of new and used supply and constriction of auction lanes generated red hot prices. Car rental consignors took advantage.
By the third quarter---usually the busiest for car rental---operators were instead selling fleet. Note that 37% to 48% of respondents acquire all of their vehicles as risk units as opposed to through manufacturers’ repurchase programs.
In the first survey, half of respondents said their first quarter revenue was down by 51% to 100%. Note the pandemic hit in the second half of the quarter.
By the second survey, the revenue drop had accelerated, with 76% of respondents saying revenue had decreased 51% to 100%. The third quarter revealed...
...the green shoots of recovery---compared to the third quarter of 2019, 45% said their revenue decreased to a lesser extent (0% to 50%.)
Remarkably, 14% said revenue hadn’t declined in the period, while 14% said revenue had actually increased.
Car rental pricing shows a more dramatic recovery from the first to third surveys, for the specific reason that operators were able to shed fleet, allowing demand to outpace supply by the third quarter.
The final questions in the third survey speak to the optimism, or lack thereof, of the car rental industry moving forward. While encouraging to see the most-selected response states the respondent is on the road to recovery, it is not a majority, and 32% say “it’s too early to tell.”
And while respondents believe their company in particular will recover, it’s an almost even split between those who believe the industry in general will recover and those who don’t. Note these questions were not asked in the first two surveys.
Similar to the previous question, more respondents identified as optimistic about the future than the other choices, and only 6% identified as pessimistic. However, the other two choices taken together reveal 59% of respondents are still uncertain and are taking a “wait and see” approach.