Twitter You Tube Facebook Autobodynews Linked In

Monday, 06 April 2020 22:42

Allstate Claims Recent Motion to Compel was Frivolous, Asks Court to Dismiss It

Written by Emmariah Holcomb, glassBYTEs.com

Index

Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Allstate Indemnity Company and Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company (collectively Allstate) filed a response to the defendants, Auto Glass America LLC (AGA) and owner Charles Isaly’s motion to compel “computations of each category of damages claimed and other evidentiary material…on which each computation is based, including materials bearing on the nature and extent of the injuries suffered” by each disclosing Allstate plaintiff.

The defendants sought to have the insurance company provide a clear breakdown of its original calculated damages which Allstate claimed exceeded $75,000.

 

According to AGA and Isaly, Allstate’s damage disclosures failed to provide a computation of each category of damages claimed for each Allstate plaintiff against each separate defendant.

 

The pair requested Allstate to voluntarily provide its initial disclosures. According to the defendants, this information is required for Allstate to provide without a request.

 

“Since Jan. 10, Allstate has failed to provide a proper mandatory damage disclosure and has failed to supplement its damage disclosures. AGA and Isaly also sought elucidation of the damages disclosure through a deposition of Allstate’s corporate representative, but that representative did not know the basis of the damages claimed by the Allstate plaintiffs,” a portion of the defendants’ motion to compel reads.

 

Allstate responded to AGA and Isaly by asking the court to deny the defendants’ “frivolous motion” and award sanctions against the defendants.

 

“Before (the) defendants filed the motion, (the) plaintiffs had repeatedly advised (the) defendants that they agreed to and were working to supplement their initial disclosures to include more detailed damages calculations,” a portion of Allstate’s response reads. “Nonetheless, (the) defendants proceeded to file their unnecessary and baseless motion to compel, in which they fail to disclose to the court the plaintiffs’ agreement, misrepresent that plaintiffs have refused to serve supplemental disclosures, and have refused to withdraw the motion—without any attempt to confer with counsel for plaintiffs about the motion, contrary to defendants’ counsel’s false certification.”

 

According to court documents, the initial disclosures were due by March 20, 2019, and the defendants’ requested an extension. Both parties agreed to extend this deadline by one week until March 27, 2019. Allstate served its initial disclosures on March 27, 2019. The defendants are now claiming that the plaintiffs were “late” in serving their disclosures, according to their motion to compel.


Previous Page Next Page »

Read 412 times