Like
other industries, collision repair includes many who shine at
fraudulently taking advantage of any situation. While restrictive
insurer pay-outs do encourage outright fraud through "get
even" cost-shifting, to place all blame for shop-perpetuated fraud on
such insurer practices would be somewhat unfair. Many shops view the
insurance industry as a "cash cow" asleep on her feet, and feel no
qualms about milking her dry when given the chance. Parts dealers have
become, by association, an accessory to this "midnight milking" effort.
It
would be somewhat reassuring to believe that shops cheat only when
insurer demands leave them little option but to "cost shift" or lose
the job and possibly a life-long customer. But what some shops see as
necessity, others view as opportunity, and get quite comfortable
cheating, rationalizing that everyone, especially insurers, is doing
it. The sick thrill is in seeing how much money can be scammed from
insurers (in reality, the consumer) before being caught. Billing for
parts not used produces this end.
Insurance reps ignore fraud
Compounding
the problem are insurance representatives who don't come down hard on
shop fraud because it was perpetrated on their shift, under their nose
(sometimes with their blessing), therefore jeopardizing their job. The
adjuster might arrange an agreement with the shop to ignore the
fraudulent act/acts so neither shop nor adjuster blows the whistle on
the other. The result of this is a situation a friend, who performs
damage-analysis investigations, terms "little DRPs"…his description of
the palm-greasing give-and-take fraud between certain shops and certain
insurance representatives that often escalates into big losses for the
paying insurer. It's also the main reason why insurance adjusters
seldom remain in one area for long. Continual rotation assures that
dishonest elements won't have time to get too cushy. Interesting, is it
not, that though insurers don't trust their own people, we're supposed
to. Like Mom used to say, "Every thief, given enough rope, will
eventually hang himself."
Buy back the fraudulently repaired car
In
cases where fraud is too obvious to be concealed, the shop may be
forced to buy-back certain vehicles, a practice looked upon by many
crooked shops as just another cost of doing business. Typically, these
are free to resell the vehicle to other unsuspecting persons, and
continue business as usual with the insurer. An insurance fraud
investigator speaking at our ACA meeting. When he was asked why
insurers don't do more to counteract fraud, I inferred from his answer
that there is no incentive for insurers to do so because enough money
is built into insurance premiums to cover fraud. Why would insurers
want to dig up trouble when they're paid handsomely not to? Besides,
fraud is profitable to more than just crooked shops. Shops that
regularly stiff insurers and consumers can afford to write lower repair
sheets than honest shops, saving insurers millions.
Cycle-time pressures
Ordering
parts "just in case we need them," is a relatively new bully on parts
suppliers' block. With stepped-up pressure on shops to complete most
repairs within a few days (to lower rental car costs and enhance
insurers' image), plus with the great number of options available on
every vehicle, comes increased pressure on parts dealers to maintain
larger inventory, deliver faster, and absorb the expenses associated
with shops ordering more parts than they will use in order to have the
right ones on hand.
Again, insurers
consider it "not our problem, since we're the big player here; we tell
you what to do, and you find a way to do it." Parts suppliers that
Neubauer interviewed stated they expect a certain amount of sheet metal
parts returned for damage, and that they have no problem with these if
returned 'promptly.' "But with DRP programs, and their tight
turn-around times, shops are 'special ordering' parts [such as
wheelhouse panels that dealers must purchase from national parts
depots] 'just to be sure.' Ford [and others] are now charging OEM parts
dealers a 20% restocking fee on special order parts returned to their
depots." Parts dealers interviewed agreed that, though few dealers
charge restocking fees for fear shops will take their business
elsewhere, the parts industry, which has for years incurred return
levels of 7-11%, is becoming panicky over present return rates of
15-20%, and more.
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>